There were also about thyroid cancer cases of which 15 have proven fatal so far , many of which could have been avoided by preventing the consumption of contaminated foodstuffs, such as milk.
Follow-up studies have firmly concluded that the accident has not caused an increase in birth defects or hereditary effects, and no measurable increase in solid cancers beyond thyroid cancer has been detected. Since the accident there has been a continuous clean-up of the site and the neighbouring areas.
A concrete shelter was rapidly built over the damaged reactor to stop further releases of radioactive material. This was a temporary solution, and it was eventually replaced by the New Safe Confinement structure, construction of which was completed in July The remaining three reactors at Chernobyl continued operating after the accident, with the last one closing in The Information Library has a page on the Chernobyl accident , which contains more detailed information.
The New Safe Confinement with Chernobyl unit 4 behind it. The 36, tonne structure was pushed metres on rails into position over the reactor building in November According to an UNSCEAR report in , about 20, cases of thyroid cancer were diagnosed in in patients who were 18 and under at the time of the accident.
The report states that a quarter of the cases in were "probably" due to high doses of radiation, and that this fraction was likely to have been higher in earlier years, and lower in later years. However, it also states that the uncertainty around the attributed fraction is very significant — at least 0. Thyroid cancer is usually not fatal if diagnosed and treated early; the report states that of the diagnoses made between and 6, cases , 15 proved to be fatal.
No increase in leukaemia or other cancers have yet shown up, but some is expected. The World Health Organization is closely monitoring most of those affected. The Chernobyl accident was a unique event and the only time in the history of commercial nuclear power that radiation-related fatalities occurred.
The destroyed unit 4 was enclosed in a concrete shelter, which was replaced by a more permanent structure in An OECD expert report on the accident concluded: "The Chernobyl accident has not brought to light any new, previously unknown phenomena or safety issues that are not resolved or otherwise covered by current reactor safety programs for commercial power reactors in OECD member countries. The first of these two came on line in There have been a number of accidents in experimental reactors and in one military plutonium-producing reactor, including a number of core melts, but none of these has resulted in loss of life outside the actual plant, or long-term environmental contamination.
Elsewhere Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors appendix we tabulate these, along with the most serious commercial plant accidents. All except Browns Ferry and Vandellos involved damage to or malfunction of the reactor core. At Browns Ferry a fire damaged control cables and resulted in an month shutdown for repairs; at Vandellos a turbine fire made the year old plant uneconomic to repair.
Mention should be made of the accident to the US Fermi 1 prototype fast breeder reactor near Detroit in Due to a blockage in coolant flow, some of the fuel melted. However no radiation was released offsite and no-one was injured. The reactor was repaired and restarted but closed down in The well-publicized criticality accident at Tokai Mura, Japan, in was at a fuel preparation plant for experimental reactors, and killed two workers from radiation exposure.
Many other such criticality accidents have occurred, some fatal, and practically all in military facilities prior to A review of these is listed in the References section. In an uncontained reactor accident such as at Windscale a military facility in and at Chernobyl in and to some extent Fukushima Daiichi in , the principal health hazard is from the spread of radioactive materials, notably volatile fission products such as iodine and caesium These are biologically active, so that if consumed in food, they tend to stay in organs of the body.
I has a half-life of 8 days, so is a hazard for around the first month, and apparently gave rise to the thyroid cancers after the Chernobyl accident. Caesium has a half-life of 30 years, and is therefore potentially a long-term contaminant of pastures and crops.
In addition to these, there is caesium which has a half-life of about two years. While measures can be taken to limit human uptake of I, evacuation of area for several weeks, iodide tablets , high levels of radioactive caesium can preclude food production from affected land for a long time. Other radioactive materials in a reactor core have been shown to be less of a problem because they are either not volatile strontium, transuranic elements or not biologically active tellurium, xenon Accidents in any field of technology provide valuable knowledge enabling incremental improvement in safety beyond the original engineering.
Cars and airliners are the most obvious examples of this, but the chemical and oil industries can provide even stronger evidence. Civil nuclear power has greatly improved its safety in both engineering and operation over its 65 years of experience with very few accidents and major incidents to spur that improvement. The Fukushima Daiichi accident was the first since TMI in which will have significant implications, at least for older plants.
A scram is a sudden reactor shutdown. When a reactor is scrammed, automatically due to seismic activity, or due to some malfunction, or manually for whatever reason, the fission reaction generating the main heat stops.
However, considerable heat continues to be generated by the radioactive decay of the fission products in the fuel. Even then it must still be cooled, but simply being immersed in a lot of water does most of the job after some time.
Aspects of nuclear plant safety highlighted by the Fukushima accident were assessed in the nuclear reactors in the EU's member states, as well as those in any neighbouring states that decided to take part. They were conducted from June to April It then negotiated the scope of the tests with the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group ENSREG , an independent, authoritative expert body created in by the European Commission comprising senior officials from the national nuclear safety, radioactive waste safety or radiation protection regulatory authorities from all EU member states, and representatives of the European Commission.
In June the governments of seven non-EU countries agreed to conduct nuclear reactor stress tests using the EU model. Armenia, Belarus, Croatia, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine signed a declaration that they would conduct stress tests and agreed to peer reviews of the tests by outside experts. Russia had already undertaken extensive checks.
The reassessment of safety margins is based on the existing safety studies and engineering judgement to evaluate the behaviour of a nuclear power plant when facing a set of challenging situations. For a given plant, the reassessment reports on the most probable behaviour of the plant for each of the situations considered. The results of the reassessment were peer-reviewed and shared among regulators.
WENRA noted that it remains a national responsibility to take or order any appropriate measures, such as additional technical or organisational safety provisions, resulting from the reassessment. The scope of the assessment took into account the issues directly highlighted by the events in Fukushima and the possibility for combination of initiating events.
Two 'initiating events' were covered in the scope: earthquake and flooding. The consequences of these — loss of electrical power and station blackout, loss of ultimate heat sink and the combination of both — were analysed, with the conclusions being applicable to other general emergency situations. In accident scenarios, regulators consider power plants' means to protect against and manage loss of core cooling as well as cooling of used fuel in storage.
They also study means to protect against and manage loss of containment integrity and core melting, including consequential effects such as hydrogen accumulation. Nuclear plant operators start by documenting each power plant site. This analysis of 'extreme scenarios' followed what ENSREG called a progressive approach "in which protective measures are sequentially assumed to be defeated" from starting conditions which "represent the most unfavourable operational states.
The documents had to cover provisions in the plant design basis for these events and the strength of the plant beyond its design basis.
This means the "design margins, diversity, redundancy, structural protection and physical separation of the safety relevant systems, structures and components and the effectiveness of the defence-in-depth concept. For severe accident management scenarios they must identify the time before fuel damage is unavoidable and the time before water begins boiling in used fuel ponds and before fuel damage occurs. Measures to prevent hydrogen explosions and fires are to be part of this. Since the licensee has the prime responsibility for safety, they performed the reassessments, and the regulatory bodies then independently reviewed them.
The exercise covered nuclear plants in 15 EU countries — including Lithuania with only decommissioned plants — plus 15 reactors in Ukraine and five in Switzerland. Operators reported to their regulators who then reported progress to the European Commission by the end of Information was shared among regulators throughout this process before the 17 final reports went to peer-review by teams comprising 80 experts appointed by ENSREG and the European Commission.
The final documents were published in line with national law and international obligations, subject only to not jeopardising security — an area where each country could behave differently. The process was extended to June to allow more plant visits and to add more information on the potential effect of aircraft impacts. The full report and a summary of the 45 recommendations were published on www.
The results of the stress tests pointed out, in particular, that European nuclear power plants offered a sufficient safety level to require no shutdown of any of them. At the same time, improvements were needed to enhance their robustness to extreme situations. In France, for instance, they were imposed by ASN requirements, which took into account exchanges with its European counterparts.
The EU process was completed at the end of September , with the EU Energy Commissioner announcing that the stress tests had showed that the safety of European power reactors was generally satisfactory, but making some other comments and projections which departed from ENSREG. The first order required the addition of equipment at all plants to help respond to the loss of all electrical power and the loss of the ultimate heat sink for cooling, as well as maintaining containment integrity.
Another required improved water level and temperature instrumentation on used fuel ponds. The third order applied only to the 33 BWRs with early containment designs, and required 'reliable hardened containment vents' which work under any circumstances. In Japan similar stress tests were carried out in under the previous safety regulator, but then reactor restarts were delayed until the newly constituted Nuclear Regulatory Authority devised and published new safety guidelines, then applied them progressively through the fleet.
Volcanic hazards are minimal for practically all nuclear plants, but the IAEA has developed a new Safety Guide on the matter. The Bataan plant in Philippines which has never operated, and the Armenian plant at Metsamor are two known to be in proximity to potential volcanic activity. Nuclear plants are usually built close to water bodies, for the sake of cooling. The site licence takes account of worst case flooding scenarios as well as other possible natural disasters and, more recently, the possible effects of climate change.
As a result, all the buildings with safety-related equipment are situated on high enough platforms so that they stand above submerged areas in case of flooding events. Occasionally in the past some buildings have been sited too low, so that they are vulnerable to flood or tidal and storm surge, so engineered countermeasures have been built.
EDF's Blayais nuclear plant in western France uses seawater for cooling and the plant itself is protected from storm surge by dykes.
However, in a 2. For security reasons it was decided to shut down the three reactors then under power the fourth was already stopped in the course of normal maintenance.
This incident was rated 2 on the INES scale. In the Kakrapar nuclear power plant near the west coast of India was flooded due to heavy rains together with failure of weir control for an adjoining water pond, inundating turbine building basement equipment.
The back-up diesel generators on site enabled core cooling using fire water, a backup to process water, since the offsite power supply failed. Following this, multiple flood barriers were provided at all entry points, inlet openings below design flood level were sealed and emergency operating procedures were updated.
Construction of the Kalpakkam plant was just beginning, but the Madras plant shut down safely and maintained cooling. However, recommendations including early warning system for tsunami and provision of additional cooling water sources for longer duration cooling were implemented.
Three of the six reactors were operating at the time, and had shut down automatically due to the earthquake. The back-up diesel generators for those three units were then swamped by the tsunami. This cut power supply and led to weeks of drama and loss of the reactors. The design basis tsunami height was 5. Tsunami heights coming ashore were about 14 metres for both plants. Unit 3 of Daini was undamaged and continued to cold shutdown status, but the other units suffered flooding to pump rooms where equipment transfers heat from the reactor circuit to the sea — the ultimate heat sink.
The maximum amplitude of this tsunami was 23 metres at point of origin, about km from Fukushima. In the last century there had been eight tsunamis in the Japan region with maximum amplitudes above 10 metres some much more , these having arisen from earthquakes of magnitude 7.
Those in and in were the most recent affecting Japan, with maximum heights This earthquake was magnitude 9. For low-lying sites, civil engineering and other measures are normally taken to make nuclear plants resistant to flooding. Lessons from Blayais and Fukushima have fed into regulatory criteria. However, few parts of the world have the same tsunami potential as Japan, and for the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of Europe the maximum amplitude is much less than Japan.
In any light-water nuclear power reactor, hydrogen is formed by radiolytic decomposition of water. This needs to be dealt with to avoid the potential for explosion with oxygen present, and many reactors have been retrofitted with passive autocatalytic hydrogen recombiners in their containment, replacing external recombiners that needed to be connected and powered, isolated behind radiological barriers. Also in some kinds of reactor, particularly early boiling water types, the containment is rendered inert by injection of nitrogen.
As of early , a few in Spain and Japan did not have them. Areva received in October a bulk order to supply its passive hydrogen recombiners to multiple Japanese units. This is beyond the capability of the normal hydrogen recombiners to deal with, and operators must rely on venting to atmosphere or inerting the containment with nitrogen. There is a lot of international collaboration, but it has evolved from the bottom, and only in s has there been any real top-down initiative.
In the aviation industry the Chicago Convention in the late s initiated an international approach which brought about a high degree of design collaboration between countries, and the rapid universal uptake of lessons from accidents. There are cultural and political reasons for this which mean that even the much higher international safety collaboration since the s is still less than in aviation.
International cooperation on nuclear safety issues takes place under the auspices of the World Association of Nuclear Operators WANO which was set up in In practical terms this is the most effective international means of achieving very high levels of safety through its four major programs: peer reviews; operating experience; technical support and exchange; and professional and technical development.
WANO peer reviews are the main proactive way of sharing experience and expertise, and by the end of every one of the world's commercial nuclear power plants had been peer-reviewed at least once. Following the Fukushima accident these have been stepped up to one every four years at each plant, with follow-up visits in between, and the scope extended from operational safety to include plant design upgrades. Pre-startup reviews of new plants are being increased.
Corium will likely remain radioactive for the next decades to centuries. This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here. More From Forbes. Nov 11, , pm EST. Nov 11, , am EST. Nov 10, , pm EST. Nov 9, , pm EST. In a worst-case meltdown scenario the puddle of hot fuel could melt through the steel containment vessel and through subsequent barriers meant to contain the nuclear material, exposing massive quantities of radioactivity to the outside world. How can a meltdown be averted?
The Japanese plant's operators have made a number of attempts to cool the reactors, including pumping seawater into the reactor core to replenish the dwindling cooling fluid.
The Tokyo Electric Power Company has also injected boric acid , an absorber of neutrons, into the reactors. How does this incident compare with Chernobyl or Three Mile Island?
At present, three of the reactors at Fukushima Daiichi station are seriously crippled. Units 1 and 3 have experienced explosions that destroyed exterior walls, apparently from buildups of hydrogen gas produced by the zirconium in the fuel rods reacting with coolant water at extremely high temperatures—but the interior containment vessels there thus far seem to be intact.
A third explosion was reported March 15 at reactor No. Pressure in the suppression pool—a doughnut-shaped water vessel below the reactor—dropped after the explosion, indicating that the containment vessel had been compromised.
In reactor Nos. And a fire at a pool storing spent fuel rods at dormant reactor No. At that Pennsylvania nuclear station in a cooling malfunction combined with worker error led to a partial meltdown—about half of the reactor core melted and formed a radioactive puddle at the bottom of the steel pressure vessel.
The vessel remained intact, but some radiation did escape from the plant into the surrounding environment. The Chernobyl accident was far more devastating; it rates as a 7, or a "major accident," on the INES scale. In Ukraine, then part of the Soviet Union, a power surge caused an explosion in one of the plant's reactors, releasing huge doses of radioactive fallout into the air.
Two plant workers died within hours, according to the U.
0コメント