Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. ClearCase vs. Git version control [closed] Ask Question. Asked 10 years, 7 months ago. Active 2 years ago. Viewed 47k times. Improve this question. Peter Mortensen 29k 21 21 gold badges 97 97 silver badges bronze badges. Anant Anant 1 1 gold badge 3 3 silver badges 3 3 bronze badges.
Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. The most obvious is to do a merge, so while on your private branch you just do: git merge sharedbranch then, if there are conflicts really a lot more rare than in ClearCase , you resolve them and git commit And that's it. Improve this answer.
Very interesting. I rarely met users with an actual experience in ClearCase and in git. ClearCase is complete garbage compared to Git. I still have nightmares about it. ClearCase is not a VCS, it's a disaster. Git has its nightmares while one runs into issues. Mercurial is easier to use than git.
Problems that I have had in a professional mixed ability office: Mutable History. You can do some really silly and powerful things with Git. This can cause source loss. Auto Merging. This is the best feature of Git. But , we had to shut development down for a week to find the source code that went missing. MSVS has a happy issue with randomly changing line endings and if you don't pull from the repository regularly it gets confused, and changes get lost.
ClearCase handles the date ordering and history for you, but Git ignores it. ClearCase at least UCM handles branch promotion and other things for you. Git does not. You will have to manage this carefully. Version tracking from actual releases and problem finding from knowing what the version of the source file is will have to be handled manually. I am not sure what your release process is.
PAntoine PAntoine 4 4 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges. See git-attributes. But: gelato. If you lose source then you might need to retrain the devs. Most git servers has the ability to lock branches so the rank and file developers can only do fast-forward pushes to those branches no force push. So that there is no mutable history for the shared repository. By quote. These packages are designed to match the needs of different-sized businesses to enable them to streamline and accelerate their projects.
To help you decide which one is the best for your company, these bundles and their inclusions are listed below. Programmers can delete compare and merge versions, create branches, and refer to the version history to track the changes made for the entirety of a project. Seamless collaborations take place within the platform through its various workflow modes and role-based codelines.
To identify coding errors, programmers can access the project's complete development history. These metrics are frequently a way to see how popular a given service is and how extensive is its online presence.
At the same time Git Twitter is followed by 0 people. Page last modified FinancesOnline is available for free for all business professionals interested in an efficient way to find top-notch SaaS solutions. We are able to keep our service free of charge thanks to cooperation with some of the vendors, who are willing to pay us for traffic and sales opportunities provided by our website.
Pricing: By quote. Pricing Model. List of Features. Pricing Info. No information available. Languages Supported. Prominent Clients.
Available Devices. Company Size. Git would require multiple repositories for the same volume of files. Multiple repositories is the only way to work independently in Git and to support multiple courses of work that are isolated from each other but are still highly interdependent.
Managing a whole project becomes difficult. And Git has a powerful merge feature that takes the independent line of development created by git branch and integrates them into a single branch. So, merging in Git is super fast. This is not the case with ClearCase, which is a little less efficient when it comes to merging.
GitHub allows you to collaborate much more easily with other people on a project. One of the main differences between the two is the repository design; ClearCase organizes its repositories as Versioned Object Bases VOB , whereas multiple repositories is the only way to work independently in Git.
GitHub has a much powerful merging feature than ClearCase. So, both have their fair share of pros and cons. ClearCase is a powerful source code management and Software Asset Management SAM tool for version control, which like other version control systems including GitHub, tracks and manages changes across the entire development lifecycle.
Git is a distributed version control system whereas SVN boasts a centralized model meaning the history of changes over time is stored on a central repository. Git is a distributed version control system based on a decentralized model, whereas Perforce is a self-hosted version control system based on a centralized model. CVS is centralized version control system, while Git is based on a distributed model. CVS is definitely one of the most reliable and efficient version control systems out there.
Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. MLA 8 Khillar, Sagar. Name required. Email required. Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment.
There is no need to resubmit your comment.
0コメント